Time to UN-Seat U.S. on the UN Security Council


In recent months, the United States has made a habit of exiting international organisations, from the World Health Organization (WHO) to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). These departures, typically justified as pragmatic rejections of bodies that no longer serve American interests, raise a pointed question: Why stop there? Why not withdraw from the most powerful international forum of all—the United Nations Security Council?

For decades, the United Nations (UN) has served as the central platform for international cooperation, with its Security Council (UNSC) intended to preserve peace and security through collective action. Yet recent developments signal a deeper structural crisis: the United States has withdrawn from or defunded several major UN-related bodies and international organisations, even while retaining a privileged position on the UNSC that allows it to block resolutions—particularly regarding Israel’s actions in Gaza.

Subscribe now and receive FREE sooka plan for 1 month. T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
US , UN , Security Council , WHO , UNHRC

Next In Columnists

Trump’s tariffs: A bold gambit with uncertain payoffs
Flavourful taste of a fruitful China-Malaysia bond
An American rediscovers his Malaysia
The fire of hope burns brighter
From commanding to crumbling – is Liverpool’s lead under threat?
Twin parks, shared dreams: How Malaysia and China are building the future together
Bitter Sweet Honeymoon Cystitis
Political fallout from disasters
When tariffs are suicidal
In tragedy, a message of hope

Others Also Read